下面的一篇习作，是我站在文章中决策者的角度，设身处地的寻找了几个错误，不知有没有达到预期目标。举例说明：
191The following is a letter from a professor at Xanadu College to the college"s president. "The development of an extensive computer-based long-distance learning program will enhance the reputation of Xanadu College. This program would allow more students to enroll in our courses, thereby increasing our income from student tuition. Traditional courses could easily be adapted for distance learners, as was shown by the adaptation of two traditional courses for our distance learning trial project last year. Also, by using computer programs and taped lectures, faculty will have fewer classroom obligations and more time to engage in extensive research, thereby enhancing the reputation of Xanadu."
看完文章后，我相信大家也会列出以下几点错误或更多：
ü 建议带有部门利益，各学科教学方法不同
ü 试样成功的部门不能代表全部
ü 该项目本身有缺陷：增加成本，学费增加，学生负担重，可能转学
ü 学校的声誉有各个因素组成
然而怎样把上述几点归类，有机结合，且看我的文章：
The letter to the president of Xanadu College is not sufficiently convincing in terms of the evidence given. Considering that the suggestion was made by a professor from particular department, one may doubt the representativeness of his request. Is it merely a one-sided argument in the interest of his department instead of all or for the sake of the professor himself?